| ШКАЛА ВОСПРИИМЧИВОСТИ К КРАСОТЕ: АНАЛИЗ ВНУТРЕННЕЙ СТРУКТУРЫ ТРЕХ ВЕРСИЙ | |
| Носова Полина Александровна 1 | |
| 1.1Новосибирский государственный университет | |
| Дата поступления 2025.04.24 | Аннотация. В статье представлены результаты исследования, направленные на проверку стабильности внутренней структуры трех русскоязычных версий шкалы восприимчивости к красоте (Engagement with Beauty Scale), что представляет собой актуальную исследовательскую задачу в связи с нехваткой в русскоязычной среде валидных и надежных инструментов для изучения эстетического восприятия. Первая версия (EBS-3) состоит из трех подшкал (красота природы; красота искусства; нравственная красота) и содержит 14 пунктов; вторая версия (EBS-4-R) состоит из четырех подшкал (красота природы; красота искусства; нравственная красота; красота идей) и содержит 18 пунктов; третья версия (EBS-5-R) состоит из пяти подшкал (красота природы; красота искусства; нравственная красота; красота идей; внешняя красота) и содержит 22 пункта. При помощи конфирматорного факторного анализа на выборке из 361 человека (EBS-3), 191 человека (EBS-4-R), 254 человек (EBS-5-R) показано, что все три версии шкалы хорошо соответствуют эмпирическим данным. Показатели пригодности моделей попали в следующие диапазоны: RMSEA (от 0,039 от 0,060); SRMR (от 0,068 до 0,079); CFI (от 0,955 до 0,977); IFI (от 0,956 до 0,977); TLI (от 0,932 до 0,967). Также в данном исследовании установлено, что EBS-3, EBS-4-R и EBS-5-R имеют хорошую внутреннюю согласованность. Коэффициенты α Кронбаха для шкал и подшкал EBS попали в следующие диапазоны: EBS-3 (от 0,86 до 0,89); EBS-4-R (от 0,84 до 0,88); EBS-5-R (от 0,78 до 0,91). |
| Ключевые слова восприимчивость к красоте; красота природы; красота искусства; нравственная красота; красота идей; внешняя красота. | |
Библиография 1. Diessner R., Solom R.C., Frost N.K., Parsons L., Davidson J. Engagement with beauty: Appreciating natural, artistic and moral beauty. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2008, Vol. 3 (4), pp. 302–317. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.303-332. 2. Diessner R., Pohling R., Stacy S., Güsewell A. Trait appreciation of beauty: A story of love, transcendence, and inquiry. Review of General Psychology, 2018, Vol. 22 (4), pp. 377–397. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000166. 3. Diessner R. Appreciation of beauty (the psychological trait), in: International lexicon of aesthetics. Vol. 5. Milano, Mimesis, 2023, pp. 49–57. DOI: 10.7413/18258630110. 4 Diessner R. Beauty beyond the Arts: Nature, Morality, and Ideas [Child and Adolescent Development of the Trait of Appreciation of Beauty], in: Development of Aesthetic Experience: Towards an Integrative Empirical Approach. Publisher, Cambridge University Press, 2025. 5. Diessner R., Kirk C., Guenthner C., Pohling R., Mobasher S. Teaching the Psychology of Engagement with Beauty: State and Trait. Teaching of Psychology, 2017, Vol. 44 (1), pp. 63–67. DOI: 10.1177/0098628316679969. 6. Diessner R. Assessment of the trait of appreciation of beauty, in: Ruch W., Bakker A.B., Tay L., Gander F. (eds.) Handbook of positive psychology assessment. Hogrefe, 2023, pp. 218–233. 7. Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. Character Strengths and Virtues, a handbook and classification. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004. 800 p. 8. Seligman M.E.P. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York, Free Press, 2011. 349 p. 9. Sabadosh P.A. Russian version of the engagement with beauty scale: the multitrait-multimethod model, Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2017, Vol 14 (1), pp. 7–21. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918.2017.1.7.21. 10. Nosova P.A. Approbation of the Russian version of the engagement with beauty scale. Reflexio, 2018, Vol. 11 (1), pp. 68–82. DOI: 10.25205/2658-4506-2018-11-1-68-82. 11. Güsewell A., Ruch W. Are there multiple channels by which to connect with beauty and excellence? Journal of Positive Psychology, 2012, Vol. 7, pp. 516–529. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2012.726636. 12. Hui R., Diessner R. Engagement with beauty in Hong Kong. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 2015, Vol. 6 (4), pp. 356–360, available at: http://www.ischolar.in/index.php/ijpp/index. 13. Nosova P.A., Fedorov A.A. Beauty in psychology: a Bibliometric Analysis. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2022, 19 (3), pp. 592–606. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-592-606. 14. Satorra A., Bentler P.M. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in сovariance structure analysis, in: Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 399–419. | |
Сведения о финансировании и благодарности | |
| THE ENGAGEMENT WITH BEAUTY SCALE: ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THREE VERSIONS | |
| Nosova Polina Alexandrovna 1 | |
| 1.1Novosibirsk State University | |
| Received 2025.04.24 | Abstract. The article presents the results of a study aimed at testing the stability of the internal structure of three Russian-language versions of the Engagement with Beauty Scale, which is a pressing research task due to the lack of valid and reliable instruments for studying aesthetic perception in the Russian-speaking environment. The first version (EBS-3) consists of 3 subscales (beauty of nature; beauty of art; moral beauty) and contains 14 items; the second version (EBS-4-R) consists of 4 subscales (beauty of nature; beauty of art; moral beauty; beauty of ideas) and contains 18 items; the third version (EBS-5-R) consists of 5 subscales (beauty of nature; beauty of art; moral beauty; beauty of ideas; external beauty) and contains 22 items. Using confirmatory factor analysis on a sample of 361 people (EBS-3); on a sample of 191 people (EBS-4-R); on a sample of 254 people (EBS-5-R) it was shown that all three versions of the scale fit the empirical data well. The model fit indices were in the following ranges: RMSEA (from 0,039 to 0,060); SRMR (from 0,068 to 0,079); CFI (from 0,955 to 0,977); IFI (from 0,956 to 0,977); TLI (from 0,932 to 0,967). Also, in this study it was established that EBS-3, EBS-4-R and EBS-5-R have good internal consistency. Cronbach's α coefficients for the EBS scales and subscales were in the following ranges: EBS-3 (from 0,86 to 0,89); EBS-4-R (from 0,84 to 0,88); EBS-5-R (from 0,78 to 0,91). |
| Keywords engagement with beauty; beauty of nature; beauty of art; moral beauty; beauty of ideas; external beauty. | |
References 1. Diessner R., Solom R.C., Frost N.K., Parsons L., Davidson J. Engagement with beauty: Appreciating natural, artistic and moral beauty. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2008, Vol. 3 (4), pp. 302–317. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.303-332. 2. Diessner R., Pohling R., Stacy S., Güsewell A. Trait appreciation of beauty: A story of love, transcendence, and inquiry. Review of General Psychology, 2018, Vol. 22 (4), pp. 377–397. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000166. 3. Diessner R. Appreciation of beauty (the psychological trait), in: International lexicon of aesthetics. Vol. 5. Milano, Mimesis, 2023, pp. 49–57. DOI: 10.7413/18258630110. 4 Diessner R. Beauty beyond the Arts: Nature, Morality, and Ideas [Child and Adolescent Development of the Trait of Appreciation of Beauty], in: Development of Aesthetic Experience: Towards an Integrative Empirical Approach. Publisher, Cambridge University Press, 2025. 5. Diessner R., Kirk C., Guenthner C., Pohling R., Mobasher S. Teaching the Psychology of Engagement with Beauty: State and Trait. Teaching of Psychology, 2017, Vol. 44 (1), pp. 63–67. DOI: 10.1177/0098628316679969. 6. Diessner R. Assessment of the trait of appreciation of beauty, in: Ruch W., Bakker A.B., Tay L., Gander F. (eds.) Handbook of positive psychology assessment. Hogrefe, 2023, pp. 218–233. 7. Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. Character Strengths and Virtues, a handbook and classification. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004. 800 p. 8. Seligman M.E.P. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York, Free Press, 2011. 349 p. 9. Sabadosh P.A. Russian version of the engagement with beauty scale: the multitrait-multimethod model, Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2017, Vol 14 (1), pp. 7–21. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918.2017.1.7.21. 10. Nosova P.A. Approbation of the Russian version of the engagement with beauty scale. Reflexio, 2018, Vol. 11 (1), pp. 68–82. DOI: 10.25205/2658-4506-2018-11-1-68-82. 11. Güsewell A., Ruch W. Are there multiple channels by which to connect with beauty and excellence? Journal of Positive Psychology, 2012, Vol. 7, pp. 516–529. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2012.726636. 12. Hui R., Diessner R. Engagement with beauty in Hong Kong. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 2015, Vol. 6 (4), pp. 356–360, available at: http://www.ischolar.in/index.php/ijpp/index. 13. Nosova P.A., Fedorov A.A. Beauty in psychology: a Bibliometric Analysis. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2022, 19 (3), pp. 592–606. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-592-606. 14. Satorra A., Bentler P.M. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in сovariance structure analysis, in: Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 399–419. | |
Acknowledgements | |
| Сведения об авторах Носова Полина Александровна 1.1 |
| About the authors Nosova Polina Alexandrovna 1.1 |
